Seeking Alpha Named Most Informative Investing Web Site by Kiplinger's

Kiplinger's Personal Finance has named Seeking Alpha the most informative investment web site in its November cover story: Best of Everything 2007. Kiplinger said about us:

MOST INFORMATIVE
SeekingAlpha.com
The site's large roster of contributors includes traders, bloggers and money managers. Nifty extras: a comprehensive section on exchange-traded funds and Q&As with CEOs.

Many thanks to Kiplinger's for the recognition!

Seeking Alpha is partnered with Yahoo! Finance (YHOO) and Dow Jones' MarketWatch and Barron's Online (DJ), provides headlines to Google News (GOOG) and AOL Money (TWX), and competes with TheStreet.com (TSCM) and other online finance sites.

Comments

[granger]

I agree completely. This site and service are amazing. What scares me is that I use magazine covers as a contrary indicator, so please keep up the good work and not change. Thanks for the great content.

[DanielJacome]

Nice job, SA team. Keep it up!

[JohnHeritage]

Well done!

[S. Rein]

How do you partner with MarketWatch and Barron's? Do pieces go up in the same way as with Yahoo Finance?

Congrats!
S. Rein

[Malkiel]

Here, here! Congratulations, and your readers always knew what others are discovering...

[DavisFreeberg]

Congrats on the recognition. I've found some of the best finance related articles on SA. Your writers might not be considered "professional&quo... journalists, but the quality of the reporting has been fantastic from the start.

[DavidJackson]

Thanks for the kind feedback. This a testament to the combination of passionate non-journalists (our contributors), intelligent filtering, tagging and editing (our editors), and supplementary resources that make the site comprehensive (transcripts, news briefs, IPO coverage etc).

[jturano7423]

David Jackson*HAPPY&HEAL... NEW YEAR! KIPLINGER'S "BEST OF EVERYTHING 2007' IS WELL DESERVED&CONGRATUL...
You won my award when you acknowledged my comment back in early April 2007. Your response was within days, and I thank you. Moving forward to 2008, I was wondering if your prospective and comments have changed somewhat now that maybe my point wasn't taken serious or not and the results of my comment was more profound than Jim Cramer's intelligence or respect from institutional's. You said "Cramer is smart and is watched by many institutional investors, so we think his stock picks are a valuable resource for us to offer on SA." Since many of his 2007 stock picks didn't do so well, what do you attribute his calls that ended up being mistakes if he is so smart?
I mean my original question was why would he pick, suggest, or Tout 'NSTK' in March 2007. Even after the stock dropped almost 48% to around $8 dollars on Nov.8th, he still suggested a "wait & see' which
has proved to be a mistake once again, now that it is under $4 dollars Dec.30th,2007. You might be right that his smart, maybe smarter than we all know! But SA should not take a stance like a cheerleader when
Cramer speaks solely. Balance and fair prospectives is what your readers need and want. Thanks for letting me once again voice my opinion. All the Best in 2008!